Portfolio lending is becoming increasing popular. One of the reasons for this is portfolio lending is not restricted to the horrific 4 property rule. Through a portfolio lender, it is possible to acquire a multitude of mortgages. However, those looking to procure loans through entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will run into the 4 property rule wall.
It is obvious that the $750 billion bailout did not do a thing to free up capital. And now the 4 property rule is a slap in the face to all real estate investors. In fact, this particular rule is a complete rejection of the principles that our capitalist society is founded on. In my opinion, the 4 property rule is designed to put real estate investors out of business. Just when the government should be inviting us to participate in the economic recovery.
So, what specifically is the 4 property rule? Essentially, the new rules of conventional lending state that a person will be limited to four financed properties at one time. Again, this is a thoroughly absurd rule that undermines many benefits of real estate investing. Basically, if you are limited to only four financed homes, you can not flip property in vast numbers.
And, as an investor this includes your primary residence! Again, this rule does nothing to help real estate investors. It is simply protectionism. And, as we all know, protectionism usually backfires. It does absolutely nothing to help the market and overall economy. Instead, the 4 property rule can significantly weaken the economy.
For example, prior to the current economic meltdown, many legitimate investors took advantage of skyrocketing real estate values. They would purchase properties at low prices and then sell high. In some cases, real estate investors would purchase significant volumes of property for resale. Some investors would purchase literally dozens of properties for resale. The profits derived from this wholesaling had an enormous benefit on the overall economy.
That is, in the absence of the 4 property rule, the sale of massive volumes of real estate would yield a number of positive effects. For example, the revenues generated could be invested into the stock market. Once invested, it would provide liquidity to many different companies. It would also generate significant tax revenue to the state and local governments. And, of course, the wealth created by this multiplexing of real estate sales would greatly expand purchasing. This would improve the economy in other sectors of the market. With the onset of the 4 property rule, all of this would cease and much of the economy could be undermined. Hopefully, this rule will eventually be revoked and return a more free market approach to the world of real estate.
Then again, regardless of whether or not this rule is revoked, portfolio lenders are not restricted to such a rule. If you wish to seek massive financing, a portfolio lender is the lender to visit.
It is obvious that the $750 billion bailout did not do a thing to free up capital. And now the 4 property rule is a slap in the face to all real estate investors. In fact, this particular rule is a complete rejection of the principles that our capitalist society is founded on. In my opinion, the 4 property rule is designed to put real estate investors out of business. Just when the government should be inviting us to participate in the economic recovery.
So, what specifically is the 4 property rule? Essentially, the new rules of conventional lending state that a person will be limited to four financed properties at one time. Again, this is a thoroughly absurd rule that undermines many benefits of real estate investing. Basically, if you are limited to only four financed homes, you can not flip property in vast numbers.
And, as an investor this includes your primary residence! Again, this rule does nothing to help real estate investors. It is simply protectionism. And, as we all know, protectionism usually backfires. It does absolutely nothing to help the market and overall economy. Instead, the 4 property rule can significantly weaken the economy.
For example, prior to the current economic meltdown, many legitimate investors took advantage of skyrocketing real estate values. They would purchase properties at low prices and then sell high. In some cases, real estate investors would purchase significant volumes of property for resale. Some investors would purchase literally dozens of properties for resale. The profits derived from this wholesaling had an enormous benefit on the overall economy.
That is, in the absence of the 4 property rule, the sale of massive volumes of real estate would yield a number of positive effects. For example, the revenues generated could be invested into the stock market. Once invested, it would provide liquidity to many different companies. It would also generate significant tax revenue to the state and local governments. And, of course, the wealth created by this multiplexing of real estate sales would greatly expand purchasing. This would improve the economy in other sectors of the market. With the onset of the 4 property rule, all of this would cease and much of the economy could be undermined. Hopefully, this rule will eventually be revoked and return a more free market approach to the world of real estate.
Then again, regardless of whether or not this rule is revoked, portfolio lenders are not restricted to such a rule. If you wish to seek massive financing, a portfolio lender is the lender to visit.
About the Author:
Susan Lassiter-Lyons has been teaching real estate investors the secrets to investor financing since 2002. Her free report, The Death of Real Estate Investing, reveals how to find portfolio lenders nationwide.
No comments:
Post a Comment